Google DeepMind included lifetime non-disparagement provisions in employment contracts for UK researchers that prohibited public criticism of the company even after leaving their roles, according to a report by The Washington Post.

The contract terms prompted pushback among artificial intelligence researchers, who argued that broad non-disparagement language impedes their ability to voice safety concerns or disclose risks associated with advanced AI systems. The issue surfaced following protests by former employee Sophia Liguori regarding Google's defense and military AI contracts.
Internal discussions escalated across DeepMind employee message channels, with researchers questioning whether the provisions prevented whistleblower activity or scientific critique. In response, Google stated that it does not enforce the non-disparagement clause against departed workers and has removed the language from new hiring agreements, though staff continue to seek formal contract amendments for existing employees.
What it is
- Lifetime non-disparagement clause. UK DeepMind employment contracts prohibited public criticism of Google during and perpetually after employment.
- Safety disclosure concerns. AI researchers voiced concerns that perpetual non-disparagement restricts transparency around AI alignment and safety risks.
- Internal employee pushback. DeepMind staff mobilized in internal forums after review of standard contract templates.
- Company response. Google confirmed the clause has been removed from future agreements and stated it does not enforce the terms against former staff.
Sources
Did this land? Leave a reaction.
Discussion
0 commentsMembers can join the discussion
Become a member to comment and reply to other members.
Become a MemberNo comments yet
Be the first to start the discussion.